Autoscaler Metrics¶
Autoscaler metrics explain whether AKS scaled too slowly, refused to scale, or scaled exactly as instructed by workload requests and policy.
Topic Groups¶
HPA and cluster autoscaler signals¶
| Metric | Source | What it means | Common use | Denominator / cardinality notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
kube_hpa_status_current_replicas | Managed Prometheus | Current replica count owned by an HPA. | Confirm whether HPA is reacting to load or sitting at a floor or ceiling. | Compare with minReplicas, maxReplicas, and the target utilization metric; the count alone does not tell you whether scaling is healthy. |
cluster_autoscaler_unschedulable_pods_count | Managed Prometheus and AKS metric surfaces | Number of pods the cluster autoscaler sees as unschedulable. | Detect when pending pods are waiting on node growth or when scale-out is blocked. | Track duration as well as count. A short spike during normal scale-up is different from a flat plateau. |
| HPA target signals (for example CPU or memory utilization) | Azure Monitor platform metrics and Managed Prometheus | The demand signal that causes HPA to raise or lower replicas. | Validate whether replica changes match the intended utilization target. | Always interpret with pod requests; HPA decisions depend on requested resources, not only on raw usage. |
| Node count and pool capacity context | Azure Monitor platform metrics | Whether node growth actually occurred after pods became unschedulable. | Separate “HPA asked for more pods” from “cluster autoscaler could not add nodes.” | Review per-pool bounds, subnet/IP availability, and quota limits together. |
Interpretation priorities¶
- HPA health is about both demand and boundaries. A stable
current_replicasvalue can mean either equilibrium or a hiddenmaxReplicasceiling. - Unschedulable pod metrics become actionable only when they persist long enough to show that cluster growth is blocked or insufficient.
- If scale-up never happens, inspect requests, topology constraints, quotas, and subnet/IP capacity before changing autoscaler settings.
Usage Notes¶
- Use autoscaler metrics together with node and pod metrics; scale failures are often visible in all three layers.
- For alerting, favor sustained unschedulable-pod conditions over brief spikes during normal demand transitions.
- Query packs and playbooks are better than one-off charts when you need to explain why scale-up was denied.
See Also¶
- Cluster Metrics
- Node Metrics
- Cluster Autoscaler Issues
- Scaling Failure
- Pending Pods
- Pending Pods KQL
- Monitoring and Logging