Content Validation Status¶

This page tracks whether major documentation areas have been reviewed for source integrity, diagram metadata, evidence quality, and internal consistency.

Validation methodology¶

Each content area is checked for:

1. Microsoft Learn traceability — every content_sources URL is topically relevant and uses en-us locale. [Validated]
2. Mermaid diagram presence with diagram-id metadata matching content_sources.diagrams[].id. [Validated]
3. Tail sections — ## See Also with meaningful internal cross-links and ## Sources with external references. [Validated]
4. Alignment with the repository information architecture. [Observed]

This repository uses content_sources frontmatter plus validate_content_sources.py and validate_mslearn_urls.py for provenance enforcement. Per-file content_validation blocks (used by the container-apps sibling) are not used here.

Current status¶

flowchart TD
    A[Draft content] --> B[Source check]
    B --> C[Diagram metadata check]
    C --> D[Evidence tagging review]
    D --> E[Publish or rework]

Interpretation notes¶

• Complete means the criterion is present and reviewable across all published pages in the section. [Observed]
• Verified means the section passed automated validation (validate_content_sources.py, mkdocs build --strict) and manual audit of source relevance, diagram metadata, and tail sections. [Observed]

See Also¶

• WAF Pillar to Pattern Map
• Validation Status
• Source Index

Sources¶

• https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/
• https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/